LaSalle's $2.7 Million Budget Mirage Revealed Ahead of April 2025 Election
LaSalle, IL — March 21, 2025
In a bombshell discovery with major implications for transparency and fiscal accountability, the City of LaSalle's FY2024 audit reveals that over $2.1 million was quietly transferred into the General Fund from a patchwork of TIF districts, utility accounts, and even library and playground funds. These inter-fund transfers effectively masked a real operating deficit of approximately $2.7 million just ahead of the city's critical mayoral election on April 1, 2025.
According to the official FY2024 audit (ending April 30, 2024), the City reported a General Fund ending balance of $2,339,796. On the surface, this appears as a positive outcome. However, the same report shows an operational shortfall of $624,624, which would have resulted in a deep deficit had it not been offset by a massive injection of cash from other funds.
The audit discloses that a total of $2,114,496 was transferred into the General Fund from the following sources:
TIF VIII Fund: $845,798
Water Fund: $855,798
Sewer Fund: $432,900
Playground Fund: $127,985
Library Fund: $35,784
Debt Service Fund: $60,738
TIF I Fund: $31,610
These transfers, detailed in the audit's Note 6 (Page 25), served to mask the structural imbalance in city operations. None of these source funds were designed to serve as bailout mechanisms for General Fund operations.
The timing of this financial sleight of hand is impossible to ignore. Mayor leadership and city officials facing public scrutiny over ongoing concerns about spending, transparency, and environmental accountability now appear to have propped up the budget just before voters head to the polls.
"This isn't balancing the books; it's a bailout from LaSalle's future," said an anonymous local government watchdog. "Playground funds, library funds, and critical infrastructure budgets were all tapped to make things look okay for an election year. That should alarm every taxpayer in this city."
These internal loans, if not paid back, could cripple LaSalle's ability to:
Maintain infrastructure under TIF district agreements
Fund water/sewer capital projects
Invest in parks, public services, and essential library programs
While the audit shows a balanced bottom line, the true picture tells a story of financial fragility and pre-election optics. The General Fund was kept afloat not by fiscal responsibility, but by draining other areas of government meant to serve the public.
This raises serious questions not just about financial practices, but about leadership, priorities, and the use of public funds for political preservation.
REFERENCES
"audit 2024.pdf", Note 6 – Interfund Transfers, Page 25
"audit 2024.pdf", Budgetary Comparison Schedule,
"audit 2024.pdf", Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances, Page 9
FY2024 General Fund Transfers Table (generated from official audit)
City of LaSalle Appropriations Document, FY2023-2024
Misuse of Restricted Funds
Relevant Laws:
Illinois TIF Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4)
Public Funds Statement Act
Illinois Municipal Code
Problem: TIF funds, water/sewer funds, and grant-backed accounts (like the Library Fund) are legally restricted to their intended purposes. Using these to patch the General Fund may constitute unauthorized reallocation or even diversion of restricted funds, which can trigger:
State audit flags
Demand for repayment
Potential liability for elected officials or finance officers
Failure to Disclose Material Fiscal Risk
Problem: Reporting a healthy General Fund balance while knowingly relying on unsustainable internal loans may qualify as misrepresentation of financial health. This could:
Undermine investor confidence if the city has issued bonds
Violate Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or GASB standards
Lead to downgrades in municipal credit ratings
Violation of Grant Terms or Bond Covenants
Problem: Some of the source funds may include state/federal grant money (e.g., infrastructure or library improvement grants). If any of the transferred dollars were drawn from grant-backed accounts, this could be a breach of grant agreements, leading to:
Forced repayment of grant funds
Disqualification from future grant programs
Federal or state investigation
Potential Election-Year Ethics Violation
Problem: The timing — just before the April 2025 election — may raise issues under:
Illinois Ethics Act
Local Governmental Officials Ethics Act
If transfers were done for political image management rather than public interest, it could be investigated as an abuse of public funds for electoral gain.
Failure of Fiduciary Duty
Problem: Elected officials and public officers have a legal duty to protect taxpayer resources. Intentionally moving money to disguise deficits may be interpreted as a breach of fiduciary responsibility, opening the door for:
Ethics complaints
Civil suits by taxpayers or watchdog groups
Removal proceedings (in extreme cases)