March 4, 2025
Written by J.Hicks
LaSalle, Illinois - A thorough review of city audits, financial reports, and meeting minutes reveals significant discrepancies in Mayor Jeff Grove's February 2025 campaign letter. The mayor's claims of financial responsibility, pension funding, and infrastructure improvements fail under closer examination. Documents indicate inconsistencies in debt reduction, TIF allocations, pension liabilities, and transparency practices.
1. Misleading Debt and Bond Claims
Mayor Grove claims that the city reduced debt by over $21 million without issuing new bonds.
However, financial records show that this reduction was achieved by reallocating TIF funds, grant
funds, and federal COVID relief, not through revenue growth or responsible spending. City audits
confirm that substantial liabilities still exist.
City Audit (2024): 'Transfers from municipal sources accounted for significant portions of debt
reductions, with grant funds being used to balance expenses.' (Source: 2024 TIF Records)
2. Pension Funding Crisis
The mayor claims that police and fire pensions are on a stable path, but records indicate otherwise.
The police pension remains only 45% funded, leaving a $15 million liability that the city will need to
cover in future budgets. Despite increased contributions, funding levels are still critically low.
Audit Report (2024): 'Police pension funding at 45% remains significantly below recommended
levels, creating a long-term liability.' (Source: 2024 Audit)
3. TIF Fund Mismanagement and Lack of Transparency
TIF funds have been misallocated to cover general budget shortfalls rather than reinvested in
redevelopment projects. Transfers to municipal accounts were made in multiple years, raising
concerns about transparency. Public records indicate that several infrastructure projects remain
unfunded, despite TIF revenues exceeding $30 million since inception.
TIF Report (2023): 'TIF funds transferred to general accounts, reducing their intended impact on
redevelopment.' (Source: 2023 TIF Records)
4. Water Infrastructure Neglect
While the mayor touts improved water monitoring, city records show that essential water system
upgrades have been repeatedly deferred. Residents have raised concerns about sediment, high
chlorine levels, and water safety issues. Budget meetings confirm delays in planned infrastructure
projects due to shifting funds elsewhere.
Finance Committee Minutes (2023): 'Deferred maintenance in multiple water infrastructure projects
due to reallocation of funds.' (Source: 2023 Finance Minutes)
5. Misrepresentation of General Fund Surplus
The claimed $1 million general fund surplus was artificially created through accounting shifts,
delayed expenses, and staff reductions. Financial reports show that restricted TIF and grant funds
were redirected to cover operational costs, making the city's finances appear healthier than they
actually are.
City Finance Minutes (2024): 'Budget adjustments include reallocating certain grant funds to offset
general fund deficits.' (Source: 2024 Finance Minutes,)
6. Lack of Transparency in City Operations
Despite the mayor's claim of transparency, numerous FOIA requests regarding financial allocations
and environmental concerns have been delayed or denied. Public meeting rules were repeatedly
changed to limit resident participation. The administration has demonstrated a clear pattern of
obstructing public oversight.
Meeting Minutes (2023): 'Repeated amendments to public comment procedures restrict citizen
engagement.' (Source: 2023 Council Minutes
LaSalle Deserves Accountability, Not Political Spin
The people of LaSalle deserve transparency and responsible financial management. The mayor's
campaign letter omits critical issues, including pension liabilities, TIF misallocations, and deferred
infrastructure projects. Voters should demand full financial audits and unrestricted FOIA access.
For additional details and supporting documents, contact:
Jamie Hicks
Investigative Journalist - Hicks News
email : thejamiehicksshow.yahoo.com
Mayor Jeff Grove Campaign letter he sent to people he thinks will vote for him. NOT ALL RESIDENTS RECIEVE THIS from him.
Unethical in my opinion.